| 杨陈,王丽芳,胡志勇,郭学兰,鲜孟筑.科技伦理治理背景下农业学术期刊的出版审查现状及对策探讨.编辑学报,2024,36(5):496-500 |
| 科技伦理治理背景下农业学术期刊的出版审查现状及对策探讨 |
| Current situation and countermeasures of publication review of agricultural academic journals under the background of ethical governance of science and technology |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2024.05.005 |
| 中文关键词: 农业科技 学术期刊 科技伦理 伦理审查 现状对策 |
| 英文关键词: agricultural science and technology academic journals ethics of science and technology ethical review current situation countermeasure |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 杨陈 | 中国农业科学院油料作物研究所《中国油料作物学报》编辑部,430062,武汉 | | 王丽芳 | 中国农业科学院油料作物研究所《中国油料作物学报》编辑部,430062,武汉 | | 胡志勇 | 中国农业科学院油料作物研究所《中国油料作物学报》编辑部,430062,武汉 | | 郭学兰 | 中国农业科学院油料作物研究所《中国油料作物学报》编辑部,430062,武汉 | | 鲜孟筑 | 中国农业科学院油料作物研究所《中国油料作物学报》编辑部,430062,武汉 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 12 |
| 全文下载次数: 32 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 农业学术期刊不仅是传播农业科学技术和成果的重要载体,还肩负着学术引领和把关示范的重要职责。科技伦理审查是农业学术期刊出版中必不可少的环节,也是期刊高质量发展的重要保障。本文调研了我国农业学术期刊的科技伦理审查现状,包括期刊稿约声明、伦理审查范围和实践力度等。结果表明,当前农业学术期刊的科技伦理审查实践与建设正处于起步阶段,缺乏统一的指导性文件和实施指南,存在着科技伦理审查实践参与度低,审查覆盖面不全,不够细致深入等问题。对此,建议期刊强化相关人员的伦理审查意识和能力,借鉴国内外伦理审查经验,完善伦理审查各环节,如在稿约中明确科技伦理审查要求等。同时呼吁相关部门尽快达成审查共识,形成行业规范,引导有序审查。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Agricultural academic journals are not only important carriers for the dissemination of agricultural science and technology, and relevant achievements, but also shoulder the important responsibilities for academic leadership and gate-keeping demonstration. Scientific and technological ethics review is an indispensable step during publication of agricultural academic journals and also an important guarantee for their high-quality development. This article investigates the current status of scientific and technological ethical review of Chinese agricultural academic journals, including the statement of the journal’s manuscript agreement, the scope of ethical review, and the practical strength. It points out that the practice and construction of scientific and technological ethics review in agricultural academic journals are in the initial stage, lacking unified guiding documents and implementation guidelines. There exists issues such as low participation in ethical review practices, incomplete review coverage, and insufficient details and depth.Therefore, it is recommended that agricultural journals strengthen the awareness and capabilities of ethical review among relevant personnel, learn from the experiences of ethical review at home and abroad, and improve all aspects of ethical review, such as clarifying the requirements for scientific and technological ethics review in the manuscript contract, and so on. At the sametime, we call on relevant departments to reach a consensus on the review as soon as possible, to form an industry standard to guide ethical review in an orderly manner. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
