| 刘森.对国家级科技期刊论文公共平台建设的思考.编辑学报,2024,36(5):473-478 |
| 对国家级科技期刊论文公共平台建设的思考 |
| Thoughts on building a national public platform for scientific journal papers |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2024.05.001 |
| 中文关键词: 科技期刊 国家级平台 开放获取 知识共享 数字基座 建设方案规划 |
| 英文关键词: scientific journals national platform open access knowledge share digital foundation construction plan planning |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 16 |
| 全文下载次数: 38 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 中国科技期刊数字化平台建设初期,在国家政策的扶持下,经过市场化运作,克服了单刊信息化水平不高的困难,中国知网、万方数据、维普等知名大型文献数据库公司应运而生。与西方国家类似,商业化文献平台在国内已成为主流,但公益性和普惠性不足,成为现实难题。本文通过梳理中国科技期刊和文献平台的现状,分析科研热点、科研环境和科技期刊出版的变化如大模型竞争激烈、美西方发动科技战和炒作对华脱钩、OA出版稳步推进等,结合中国国情和国际形势,提出有必要尽快建设国家级科技论文公共平台,主要提供存档和查阅服务,并给出了初步方案。国家级平台与商业化平台相辅相成,前者担当知识共享的自主数字基座,后者面向市场需求发挥快速多样的开发能力,共同支撑中国科技期刊繁荣发展。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In the construction of China’s sci-tech journal digital platform, with the support of the government and market-oriented operation in the early stage, the difficulties of low level of informatization for individual journals were overcome, leading to the emergence of well-known large-scale literature database companies such as CNKI, Wanfang Data, and Weipu. Similar to western countries, commercial literature platforms have become mainstream in China, but they lack public welfare and inclusiveness, presenting a real challenge. This paper, by sorting out the current status of Chinese sci-tech journals and literature platforms, analyzes changes in research hotspots, research environment, and publication of scientific journals, such as fierce competition in large models, the technology war initiated by the US and the West, and the hype over decoupling from China, as well as the steady progress of open access publishing. In line with China’s national and international situations, it proposes the necessity to build a national public platform for scientific papers as soon as possible, mainly providing archiving and access services, and a preliminary plan is provided. This national platform and commercial platforms complement each other. The former serves as an independent digital foundation for knowledge sharing, while the latter leverage market demand for rapid and diverse development of capabilities, jointly supporting the prosperous development of Chinese sci-tech journals. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
